Case
Law, Federal Law, MN Statutes, and MN Rules
For Your Lawyer To Address
Judge/Referee/Magistrate Must Enforce The
Provisions of Law
MN statute is 518.553 Payment Agreements:
In proposing or approving proposed written payment agreements … the court, a
child support magistrate, or the public authority, shall take into
consideration ... the earnings of the obligor ... and shall consider the
individual financial circumstances of each obligor in evaluating the obligors
ability to pay any proposed payment agreement and shall propose a
reasonable payment agreement tailored to the individual financial circumstances
of each obligor.
MN
Statute 518.551 (Maintenance and support payments), Subdivision 5
(Notice to Public Authority; guidelines), (b), (ii), (E), “ …
There is a presumption of substantial unfairness if after the sum total of
child support … is subtracted from the noncustodial
parent’s income, the income is at or below 100 percent of the federal poverty
guideline.”
MN
Statute 518.551 (Maintenance and support payments), Subdivision 5
(Notice to Public Authority; guidelines), (i)
“The guidelines …shall be used in all cases when establishing or modifying
child support …(j) The provisions of this paragraph
apply whether or not the parties are each represented by independent counsel
...”
MN
Statute 518.145 (Decree, finality, and reopening), Subdivision 2
(Reopening) “On motion and upon terms as are just, the court may
relieve a party from a judgment and decree, order, or proceeding under this
chapter”, “and may order a new trial or grant other relief as may
be just for the following reasons (1) mistake, inadvertence,
surprise or excusable neglect.”
MN
Statute 518.551 (Maintenance and support payments), Subdivision 5
(Notice to Public Authority; guidelines), (j) “If the child
support payments are assigned to the public agency under section 256.741,
the court may not deviate downward from the child support guidelines unless
the court specifically finds that the failure to deviate downward would impose
an extreme hardship on the obligor.”
MN
Statute 518.551 (Maintenance and support payments), Subdivision
5b (Determination of Income), (d) “… A parent is not considered
voluntarily unemployed or underemployed upon a showing by the parent that the
unemployment or underemployment: … (2) represents a bona
fide career change that outweighs the adverse effect of that parent’s
diminished income on the child. Imputed income means the estimated earning
ability of a parent based on the parent’s prior earnings history,
education, and job skills, and on availability of jobs
within the community for an individual with the parent’s qualifications.”
MN Statute 518.551 Subd. 5d (Determination of
Income) (e) If there is insufficient
information to determine actual income to impute income pursuant to paragraph
(d), the court may calculate support based on full-time employment of 40 hours
per week at 150 percent of the federal minimum wage or the
MN
Statute 518.68 (Required Notices), Subdivision 2 (Contents),
IMPORTANT NOTICE 3 (Rules of Support, Maintenance, Visitation),
(g) “… the court is not permitted to reduce support retroactively, except
as provided in Minnesota Statutes, section 518.64, Subdivision 2,
paragraph (c).
Conclusion:
Arrearages can be modified. There is an exception and that includes if
the obligors compensation has changed. Additionally, the government can only
deny a modification on arrears if it is government debt. Private debt can be
negotiated with the other party in a settlement.
MN
Statute 518.64 (Modification of orders or decrees) Subdivision 2
(Modification), (a) “the terms of an order respecting maintenance
or support may be modified upon a showing of one or more of the following (1)
substantially increased or decreased earnings of a party.”
MN
Statute 518.64 (Modification of orders or decrees) Subdivision 2
(Modification), (d) “… modifications may be applied to an earlier
period if the court makes express findings that: (1) …a material misrepresentation
of another party, …(3) … the record contains no factual evidence,
or clearly erroneous evidence regarding the individual obligor’s ability
to pay.”
MN Statute 518.551 Subdivision 5 (Notice to
Public Authority; guidelines) (c), which states, “ … the court shall
take into consideration the following factors in setting or modifying child
support in determining whether to deviate from the guidelines: (1) all
earnings, income, and resources of the parents …”
[emphasis added].
CASE LAW – Child Support Must Be Based On Ability To
Pay
“The
requirement of the ability to pay is implicit in MN Statute under the
term ‘willful’.” State v Thurmas,
1951, 233
“obligation of father to support his progeny must
take precedence over every consideration for himself not arising from
absolute necessity of self-sustenance.” State v. Fuerst, 1969, 283
“Obligation to pay child support is premised on
obligor’s ability to pay,” Schneider v. Schneider, App. 1991, 473
N.W.2d 329.
42 U.S.C. 1301 (d). General Provisions of the Social Security Act.
“Nothing in this act should be construed as authorizing any federal official,
agent or representative, in carrying out any of the provisions of this act, to
take charge of any child over the objection of either parents
of such child, or of the person standing in loco parentis
to such child.”
Poverty
Guideline for 2003:
(for the 48
Contiguous States and the
Size of |
Poverty |
|
|
1............................. |
$8,980 |
|
|
2............................. |
$12,120 |
|
|
3............................. |
$15,260 |
|
|
4............................. |
$18,400 |
|
|
5............................. |
$21,540 |
|
|
6............................. |
$24,680 |
|
|
7............................. |
$27,820 |
|
|
8............................. |
$30,960 |
|
|
For
family units with more than 8 members, add $3,140 for each additional member. (The
same increment applies to smaller family sizes also, as can be seen in the
figures above.)
For more information visit Federal
Register (Volume 68, Number 26)
Educational Booklet #AL03-04
The purpose of this information is to help ensure that you are asking your lawyer all the pertinent and relevant questions that must be addressed in your motion, affidavit, and memorandum of law, in order to help ensure a thorough argument based on all facets of the law. No argument with merit should be overlooked; and every document is critical to the record. Your case must be appropriately and adequately presented to the court, to protect and safeguard you for all possible appeal issues.
Prepared
By:
Center
For Parental Responsibility
CPR
Voicemail: 651/490-9277
Website:
cpr-mn.org
Email:
info@cpr-mn.org
Latest Update:
“The General Accounting
Office found that as many as 14% of fathers who owe child support are dead. The
report further stated that 66% of fathers who owe support can not afford to pay
the amount ordered.”
Source: Wall Street Journal
“The
problem is that review and adjustment mechanisms are usually slow and
cumbersome making them difficult for low-income parents to access and navigate.
They typically do not respond to the unstable job market that most poor parents
find themselves in. In addition states often are reluctant to decrease the
order … This means that an unemployed father may have little practical ability
to reduce his obligation and build-up of unpaid arrears (back payments).”
Source: CLASP,
Realistic Child Support Policies for Low Income Fathers, by Vicki Turetsky, March 2000
According to Laura Kadwell, Director of the MN Child Support Enforcement
Agency, “a recent study of 5200 parents with overdue payments showed that half
made less than $18,000 … a big reason it (state) doesn’t collect the remaining
third is that noncustodial parents often don’t earn
enough money to pay their support or overdue debt.”
Source: “Amnesty Pondered For Child Support,”
“The General Accounting
Office found that as many as 14% of fathers who owe child support are dead. The
report further stated that 66% of fathers who owe support can not afford to pay
the amount ordered.”
Source: Wall Street Journal
“The
problem is that review and adjustment mechanisms are usually slow and
cumbersome making them difficult for low-income parents to access and navigate.
They typically do not respond to the unstable job market that most poor parents
find themselves in. In addition states often are reluctant to decrease the
order … This means that an unemployed father may have little practical ability
to reduce his obligation and build-up of unpaid arrears (back payments).”
Source: CLASP,
Realistic Child Support Policies for Low Income Fathers, by Vicki Turetsky, March 2000
According to Laura Kadwell, Director of the MN Child Support Enforcement
Agency, “a recent study of 5200 parents with overdue payments showed that half
made less than $18,000 … a big reason it (state) doesn’t collect the remaining
third is that noncustodial parents often don’t earn
enough money to pay their support or overdue debt.”
Source: “Amnesty Pondered For Child Support,”
EXTRA
MN
RULE
Rule 3400.0183 Subp. 2, I am
allowed to TERMINATE CHILD CARE ASSISTANCE.
FED
LAWS
More
case law
Ø Are
my constitutional rights being violated?
o
Violation of Right of Privacy:
§
If a private agreement has been made, there
is no compelling state interest and there should be no delivery of government
services.
o
Violation of Procedural Due Process:
§
If they notified the employer of a mandatory
cost-of-living increase before you have been notified and/or before you have
been given a fair hearing and so adjudicated.
o
Violation of Substantive Due Process:
§
If you have not been offered an opportunity
to challenge the assignment of rights, and seek appropriate relief.
o
Violation of 1st Amendment and 9th
Amendment:
§
If you are a fit parent and have been
prevented from protected liberty interest of parenting the way you chose.
o
Violation of Equal Protection (5th
and 14th Amendment):
§
The law is there to make sure that your
rights as a non-custodial parent are as protected as the custodial parent.
§
Since the state can’t require a married
family to spend more on their children, they can’t require you to spend more.
o
Violation of Civil Rights
§
If your 1301 (d) objection is not honored
the public authority is in violation of federal law if they continue the
unwanted, unnecessary government intrusion in your family.
“Having
canceled the bond which stood against us with its legal demands; this He set
aside, nailing it to the cross.” Colossians 2:14
CPR Vision
Statement: An inter-denominational, faith-based,
bi-partisan, gender-neutral, tax-exempt public policy and educational
organization to protect the civil rights of both parents to protect the
children.
CPR educational
booklets are updated regularly. If you have suggestions on how to improve this
brochure, please notify us. For current release of this brochure, visit our
website.
CPR educational
booklets do not purport to give legal advice. The information contained herein
is general in nature; individual circumstances will always vary. We recommend
you consult an attorney for advice and legal representation.
CPR
is in the process of applying for non-profit status, CPR is currently under
umbrella of tax-exempt 501 c(3) organization, Providence
House
ã
2003 may be copied by permission only – derivative works or reproductions are a
violation of copyright without prior authorization from CPR