ncaa jerseys football

I ordered a pack of these cheap plastic rulers from eBay for about No screenshots, or pictures with added or superimposed text. This includes image macros, comics, infographics and most diagrams. No nudity, porn or gore. Other NSFW content must be tagged. No personal information. This includes anything hosted on Facebook servers, as they can be traced to the original account holder. Stalking harassment will not be tolerated. "upvote this"). No DAE, "[FIXED]" or "cake day" posts, nor posts addressed to a specific redditor. "[FIXED]" posts should be added as a comment to the original image. Submissions must link directly to a specific image file or to a website with minimal ads. We do not allow blog hosting of images ("blogspam"), but links to albums on image hosting websites are okay. URL shorteners are prohibited. No animated images. Please submit them to /r/gif, /r/gifs, or /r/reactiongifs instead. If your submission appears to be filtered but definitely meets the above rules, please send us a message with a link to the comments section of your post (not a direct link to the image). Don delete it as that just makes the filter hate you! If you come across any rule violations, please report the submission or message the mods and one of us will remove it! Please note: serial reposters may be filtered Please also try to come up with original post titles. Submissions that use certain clichs/memes will be automatically tagged with a warning. More time consuming than incremental budgeting. Justifying every line item can be problematic for departments with intangible outputs. Requires specific training, due to increased complexity vs. incremental budgeting. In a large organization, the amount of information backing up the budgeting process may be overwhelming. There Crimson Tide 4 Mark Barron Red Stitched NCAA Jersey are disadvantages (from the same wikipedia entry). Still, based on the number of governmental deficits I hear about regularly on NPR, I guess it to be worth it. Wonder how bad things will have to get before we start to see common sense strategery overtake current practices. You see this a lot in government and I seeing it more and more in the private sector. Here is the explanation. Bad/lazy managers and CEOs and CFOs don give a shit about the actual dollar amounts; threy care about year ncaa store football over year variance. As long as it a little less than last year they can claim they cutting costs. They don particularly care about what goes into budgetmaking decisions. So, your department usually has a $1 million budget for yearly replacement of imaging equipment. You solicit quotes and MedImgCo says that a deal fell apart and, if you get a contract in place quickly, he give you what you need for $750k. Awesome! Actual vs budget, you showing a 25% negative variance. You look good, your manager looks good, your CFO and CEO look good. Drinks are consumed, backs are slapped, cigars are smoked in wood paneled rooms. Next year, you submit your usual request for $1 million. Good manager/CFO/CEO: "Wasn it 750k last year? Oh that right, you managed to get a pretty good deal. Alright, I know a lot of it was luck, but let see if we can make lightning strike twice. You approved for a million but I really want you to try and hit 750 again. There a $5k bonus in it for you if you do. If you can I walk the board through the reasoning." Bad manager/CFO/CEO: "Wasn it 750k last year? I don care if it was a lucky deal, I can go to the board with a 33% increase! Are you nuts? You approved for 750k." Note: Both the example and the explanation are incredibly simplified. Managing large budgets is a complex process. So is managing a large enterprise. Sometimes you can have smart people at the top but board members who are dumb as bricks. Sometimes you have to answer to taxpayers and, to bastardize TLJ in MiB, a taxpayer is smart and can be made to understand these things. Taxpayers Crimson Tide 3 Trent Richardson Red Stitched NCAA Jersey are fucking morons and you never convince them. Real world examples are going to be much more complicated. Fundamentally, though, it all boils down to someone saying, "you did it last year for X, you have to do it this year for X." Think of it this way, these contracts are for companies that buy in incredible bulk. Many times suppliers won have the equipment or distribution to be able to make that much supply of something. All public services (education, hospitals, military) want to get their stuff from the same supplier to create uniformity across the country (easier tracking, supply data, and ability to stamp out fraud, waste, and abuse). Let say the health care system wants to set up a system where they can purchase millions of plastic rulers for instance. No company can make that many rulers so the health care system has to buy from many many different suppliers which is a nightmare logistics wise and a headache for any hospital/school/military supply person. unless they set up a contract with one company so that company can provide the millions of rulers all across the country. Now this company is currently small and doesn have the money to produce that many rulers, so in the contract the government overpays for each ruler, which factors in establishing more factories for the company, upping distribution, hiring laborers, etc.

ncaa jerseys football